LeetCode in Python: Algorithms Coding Interview Preparation

What you will learn
Solve Easy to Hard Difficulty problems using different data structures and algorithms
How to solve some of the most popular interview questions asked by major tech companies
Breaking down the coding interview problems in a step by step, systematic manner
Popular problems patterns
Algorithms and data structures
Strengthen your problem solving and programming skills
Course Gallery




History
Comidoc Review
Our Verdict
<p>The LeetCode in Python: Algorithms Coding Interview Preparation course lives up to its title, providing an effective study resource for those prepping for technical interviews. With a strong emphasis on algorithms and data structures, students will appreciate the balance between theory and practical application exemplified in 50 LeetCode problems.</p><p>However, improvements are necessary regarding audio consistency as well as slide design and uniformity to meet the standards of an otherwise commendable course. The instructor's eagerness to address student queries sets a positive tone for this learning experience. Overall, students should be prepared to supplement the material with alternative resources when needed while still gaining valuable insights from expert explanations.</p>
What We Liked
- Comprehensive coverage of data structures and algorithms with a strong focus on problem-solving strategies for coding interviews
- Instructor provides clear, detailed explanations aided by visualizations, making complex topics more accessible
- High-quality content with a good balance between theory and practice; includes 50 LeetCode problems
- Timely and helpful instructor responses to student questions, fostering an engaged learning environment
Potential Drawbacks
- Variable audio quality throughout the course can be inconvenient; using headphones is recommended
- Some slides lack consistency in design, causing a slight distraction from learning
- Occasional need for students to seek alternative explanations or resources due to perceived errors or inconsistencies in instructor's approach